Sealed forensic record · Report #2008

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: Minnesota

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform** This case tracks potential violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and New York State Human Rights Law as applied to web accessibility standards established in *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.*, 9th Cir. The defendant operates a consumer-facing digital platform. The agent captured 15 accessibility violations across the scanned pages. Third-party tracking infrastructure fired 18 times during the run. Screenshots document the platform's interactive and content-delivery surfaces. No verbatim user-facing representations were collected; findings remain unclassified pending further review. Sealed PDF chain-of-custody: 25 screenshots, ~15–25 pages.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase