Sealed forensic record · Report #2116

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: California

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target (sign-in-wrap)

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law** Consumer-facing wellness platform. Agent captured 12 accessibility violations across 15–25 pages of sealed PDF. Site fires 263 third-party trackers. Representations include: "7 Clinically Tested Formulas"; "doctor recommended and proudly manufactured in the USA"; "deliver real results to help you reach your wellness goals"; "create targeted formulas that are grounded in scientific research to deliver real, measurable results"; "Arthro-7 is proven to significantly improve overall joint health. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled human study, over 74.5% of subjects reported a significa"; "It's a fast-acting joint formula with results seen in as little as 2 weeks!"; "In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, over 74.5% of participants reported significant improvement in joint health after 12 weeks." 28 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals; sealed PDF 15–25 pages.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase