← Back to marketplace
Pixels & Web Privacy Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody · Site state has likely changed

Sealed forensic record · Report #445

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: Georgia
Nat'l classCalif. statewide — CIPA is state law
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsCIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA
**Case Theory** CIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA claims against a consumer-facing platform. Investigation targeted third-party data transmission and tracking infrastructure. **Findings** A consumer-facing platform fired 109 third-party trackers during scope runs. No verbatim user-facing representations were captured; scope was blocked by embedded CAPTCHA after 2 turns. No accessibility violations detected across pages scanned. Five screenshots with chain-of-custody seals document tracker fire events. Sealed PDF contains approximately 15–25 pages of evidence. **Chain of Custody** Evidence preserved in sealed PDF with photographic documentation.

Case theory: CIPA / Wiretap / VPPA

What you receive

  • Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
  • Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
  • Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
  • Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
  • Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
  • Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.

First buyer holds the hash exclusively. Once we confirm payment, the defendant identity is revealed, the listing disappears, and the sealed PDF is emailed within minutes. No other firm receives this record.