ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #691
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: California
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III / Web Accessibility**
This consumer-facing platform faces potential liability under the ADA Title III, *Robles v. Domino's* (9th Cir.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and NY State Human Rights Law for web accessibility barriers. The platform's website contains 15 accessibility violations across scanned pages, preventing users with disabilities from accessing product information and purchasing functionality.
The platform makes numerous product claims including "[DEFENDANT] made from exactly two ingredients — water and coffee made from 100% Arabica beans," "[DEFENDANT] made with only three simple, whole-food ingredients: Water, organic almonds, and sea salt," "[DEFENDANT] It's made with 100% recycled plastic," "[DEFENDANT] with just three grams of sugar per serving," "[DEFENDANT] Barista Blends froth, foam, and steam perfectly for all your espresso creations," "[DEFENDANT] Creamy Refreshers are irresistibly refreshing, lower-sugar juice blends," "[DEFENDANT] producing oat and almond milk uses less water and land, and emits less greenhouse gas compared to dairy," and "[DEFENDANT] Our products are made with simple, dairy-free and plant-based ingredients." These representations are inaccessible to screen-reader users and those relying on keyboard navigation.
10 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals document the violations across approximately 15–25 pages in the sealed PDF.
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.