Sealed forensic record · Report #697

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III / Web Accessibility** This tease concerns an AI services platform defendant. The case theory rests on ADA Title III compliance under *Robles v. Domino's* (9th Cir.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and NY State Human Rights Law. During a 12-turn agent run, the platform's web presence was scanned across approximately 15–25 pages, yielding 12 accessibility violations and 48 third-party tracker fires. No verbatim representations of non-compliance were captured. The sealed PDF contains 14 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals documenting the technical findings.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase

✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.