ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #700
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Texas
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform**
This defendant, a consumer-facing platform, operates a website that fails to meet WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards under the framework established in *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.*, 9th Cir. (2020), and violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Applicable to New York State claims under the NY Human Rights Law.
Agent audit captured 10 accessibility violations across the site. Third-party tracking infrastructure includes 205 tracker fires, indicating extensive data collection during user sessions. Screenshots document the violations with sealed chain-of-custody verification.
Sealed PDF contains approximately 15–25 pages of evidence, including full-page captures with forensic timestamps.
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.