Sealed forensic record · Report #704

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target (enforceable clickwrap)

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Food & Beverage / AI Services** Defendant operates in the food/beverage and AI services sectors. Under *Robles v. Domino's* (9th Cir.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and NY State Human Rights Law, websites of public accommodations must provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. This run captured 8 accessibility violations across ~15–25 pages of defendant's web presence. The agent also detected 37 third-party tracker fires during the audit. No verbatim representations were obtained; findings remain unclassified pending further review. 23 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals document the full audit trail in the sealed PDF.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase

✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.