GPC / Do-Not-Sell
Flagship
$1,000
Captured Jun 14, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #879
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classScope varies — see report
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsCCPA Civ. Code §1798.135 (opt-out) / CPRA / Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11 §7025 (GPC must be honored)
**CCPA Do-Not-Sell / GPC Non-Compliance**
Consumer-facing platform defendant allegedly fails to honor Global Privacy Control (GPC) opt-out signals and does not provide a functional "Do Not Sell My Personal Information" link compliant with Cal. Civ. Code §1798.135 and Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11 §7025.
Agent captured 189 third-party tracker fires across the domain, indicating persistent data collection despite GPC transmission. One accessibility violation documented. No affirmative representations about privacy practices were recorded. Five screenshots with forensic chain-of-custody seals. Sealed PDF spans approximately 15–25 pages.
Case theory: CCPA §1798.135 / CPRA / 11 CCR §7025
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-08-05).
No same-kind case against this defendant (federal RECAP + web, <3yr).
No same-kind case against this defendant (federal RECAP + web, <3yr).